It groups incoming contracts by type and pulls out the key clauses, like payment, liability, term, and termination.
Contract review, risky clauses, and legal deadlines come together instead of scattered across inboxes, so the risky line gets flagged before you sign.
Small companies often skim and sign NDAs, service, supply, and subcontract agreements with no lawyer. Take the other side's draft as-is and you inherit shifted liability, steep late fees, automatic renewal, and termination penalties, and you only find out after signing. On top of that the contracts scatter across email, chat, and drive, so nobody knows which version was signed or when the renewal and termination notice deadlines fall, which turns into an unwanted auto-renewal or a payment dispute.
We gather the work as it actually arrives, and record what each step is judged against.
Pull contracts from email, drive, and chat into one place, and extract the type (NDA, service, supply, subcontract, lease), the counterparty, the amount, and the term.
Pull the core clauses (payment and timing, liability and its scope, term and auto-renewal, termination and penalty, confidentiality, venue and governing law) into one table.
Flag one-sided liability shifting, steep late fees, uncapped liability, unfair terms, and missing required clauses, with a risk level.
Extract the signature deadline, the term end, the auto-renewal opt-out deadline, and the renewal or termination notice date, register them in a deadline calendar, and set advance reminders.
Lay out the clause-by-clause issues, candidate edits, and risk levels on one page for the person handling it, and mark items that need a lawyer.
We settle the exceptions that actually come up before they do. When a rule doesn't fit, we don't force it through. It goes to a person, with the evidence.
Pull only the terms worse than your standard, split them into what is acceptable and what must be removed, and let a person make the negotiation call.
Do not force a category. Mark it type unclear and lawyer review recommended, but still set the signature deadline so it does not get ignored.
Show the sections that failed to extract as the original text and leave those clauses for a person to check, so a missed clause is not passed off as reviewed.
Anything touching money, contracts, personal data, or the brand is drafted and no further. It sends only after a person approves.
Signing binds the company, so a person always does it.
The negotiating cards and concessions are a relationship and strategy call, so a person sets them.
Judging a clause's legal effect is a lawyer's job, and AI does not stand in.
Whether and when to give notice bears on cost and the relationship, so a person decides.
It grows the obligations you take on afterward, so a person confirms.
How you know it worked
Worth measuring in-house. The share of contracts with an issue summary raised before signing, aiming to drive to zero the cases where a problem is found only after signing.
Catching one-sided indemnity, auto-renewal, and late-fee clauses before signing is far cheaper than disputing them afterward. Filtering before signature saves the cost of a later fight.
Worth measuring in-house. Aiming to drive to zero the contracts that auto-extend because an auto-renewal or termination notice deadline was missed.
There is no US equivalent of a subcontracting-fairness statute that voids unfair terms by default, so protection comes from the contract itself and general contract law. Read the counterparty's draft against your standard terms and watch for one-sided indemnity, uncapped liability, automatic renewal, and steep late fees. Many states have automatic-renewal laws that require a renewing subscription to be disclosed clearly and be easy to cancel, and the FTC also regulates negative-option terms, so auto-renewal clauses deserve a close look. When a contract collects personal information about the counterparty or its staff, handle it under the applicable privacy law with notice and a lawful basis. Judging the legal effect of a clause and handling a dispute is a lawyer's job, and Velros AI is not a lawyer.
Once the scattered checks and repeat replies are drafted and sorted, your staff can spend the day on review and exceptions, and you look only at the decisions that matter.
Get an assessmentContracts are scattered across email, WhatsApp Business, and Google Drive, so you skim in a hurry, sign, and only then spot the clause that works against you.
Incoming contracts land in one place with the issues and deadlines laid out clause by clause, and a person focuses only on judgment and signing.
The things people actually check first about Contract review.
Yes. Velros AI is not a lawyer. It goes as far as laying out the clause issues, toxic clauses, gaps, and deadlines for a person, and judging legal effect, editing, advising, and signing are done by a person, with a lawyer where needed.
No. It gathers the contracts already in your email and drive as they are and adds only the review summary and the deadlines.
Filing-deadline compliance rate
Compliance deadline calendar can be joined up the same way, on the channels you already use, from intake through to the approval queue.
Brand-protection coverage
Trademark and brand protection can be joined up the same way, on the channels you already use, from intake through to the approval queue.
Trial-to-paid conversion rate
Free trial to paid conversion can be joined up the same way, on the channels you already use, from intake through to the approval queue.
Inquiries, bookings, quotes, order updates. You can compare the work that keeps a person busy, side by side.
