The work your company repeats every day, handled by Velros AI instead of people Get a free assessment →

The approval rules for handing work to Velros AI safely

It is risky if Velros AI sends the wrong thing to a customer. So the heart of automation is not speed, it is designing the approval rules that decide where a person checks.

3 min read ·

What makes people hesitate to automate is usually a worry about control. Approval rules turn that worry into an operating rule, keeping the company's responsibility and judgment in place.

Rules worked out on real customer builds

Approval is not a brake

Put a person in front of every action and nothing has been handed over. Approval stands in front of what cannot be undone. A wrong delivery update is fixed by sending another one. A refund that has left does not come back.

Three tracks, not one

Reversible work with a clear rule runs. Work where an amount, a term or a tone is at stake is drafted and passed to a person. Work that is hard to undo, or likely to be disputed, is not attempted at all and goes straight across. When it is ambiguous, stopping is the default.

Sometimes the law is what calls the person

Under GDPR Article 22 an individual has the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing that significantly affects them, and where such a decision is allowed the controller must offer human intervention. The United States has no general federal equivalent, but Colorado and California each grant a right to human review of automated decisions in consequential matters from January 2027. The approval boundary is a legal line before it is a preference.

GDPR Article 22 (2018); Colorado SB 26-189 and California's CPPA ADMT rules, both effective 1 January 2027

Build the card so nobody has to go looking

One line on what is about to happen, the evidence it was decided from, a flag on what is at stake, and four choices: approve, reject, ask for a change, hand to someone else. Everything else comes out. If the approver has to reopen the original thread, that is not an approval, it is an investigation.

What gets approved becomes next week's standard

Which draft a person corrected and how, what they refused and why: keep that and the same situation asks less next time. Approval is not one act of defence. It is how the standard gets written.

Widen the boundary from the inside

Hand over the reversible work, let the record build, then open the next square. Money, contracts, personal data and anything leaving the company stay behind longest. What justifies widening is the error rate of the last four weeks, not confidence.

Guides to read next

A few short pieces you can read next, from the same operating standard.

Operations assessment

Let us sort out what your company should put in the approval queue.

Working from the channels and files you use today, we settle which work should be handled first, where a person has to approve, and which metric will show whether it worked.

Get an assessment